The State of Nature in Katrina’s Eye

by Jason Godesky

John M. Shanahan once called civilization, “a thin veneer over barbarianism.” It is a quote that is finding a great deal of use this week to describe the fall of New Orleans. If Katrina is not the catalyst of the collapse, it is at least a harbinger of things to come. It is a preview of what follows from the catastrophic breakdown of hierarchical society. In New Orleans, we see a glimpse of what awaits every city, and likely in our lifetimes. It is a dark and terrible tribulation–the greatest horror that any animal has ever had to face, wherein humanity will answer for 10,000 years of tyranny and despotism. But even in the darkest hour, hope endures.

The breakdown of hierarchical power in New Orleans was as immediate as it was complete. Rival gangs waited out the storm to war against one another for the ruins. The Superdome and convention center became a Darwinian hell of rape, murder, suicide and filth, with people preying upon one another without fear of punishment or retaliation.

Women spoke of the terror they felt as gangs of thieves and rapists roamed the streets and temporary shelters night after night, plucking victims — some of them children — at whim and with no fear of police intervention.

“They took what they wanted and nobody stopped them,” said Tanika James, 27, who was among a large group of refugees who arrived in Baton Rouge and other parts of Louisiana on Friday. “It was the most scared I (have) been.”

“There were bodies floating everywhere. Lots of them. Some had bullets in them,” Davis said, as he described his escape from a neighborhood that was immersed in more than 10 feet (3 metres) of water earlier this week.1

The ocean took back what three centuries of New Orleanians had tried to take from it. A 3-foot shark was sighted in the flooded streets. With the overwhelming stench of the dead and mildew, the swampy bowl of New Orleans has become a public health nightmare of truly epidemic proportions.

And through it all, the very worst of human nature–looting, murder, rape….

It is a reality so stark and undeniable it has destroyed the usual spin machines of 24-hour cable news. CNN provided a list of the “disconnects” between reporting and reality in New Orleans in Katrina’s wake. When Sean Hannity of “Hannity & Colmes” asked for some “perspective” when Shepard Smith implied that the government had left the poor of New Orleans to die, Smith replied, “This is perspective! This is all the perspective you need!”2 Jack Shafer offered a piece for Slate on the various breakdowns at CNN with, “Rebellion of the Talking Heads.”

The scrapbook of history accords but a few pages to each decade, and it is already clear that the pages devoted to this one will be grisly. There will be pictures of bodies falling from the twin towers, beheaded kidnapping victims in Iraq and corpses still floating in the waterways of New Orleans five days after the disaster that caused them.

It’s already clear this will be known as the grueling decade, the Hobbesian decade. Americans have had to acknowledge dark realities that it is not in our nature to readily acknowledge: the thin veneer of civilization, the elemental violence in human nature, the lurking ferocity of the environment, the limitations on what we can plan and know, the cumbersome reactions of bureaucracies, the uncertain progress good makes over evil.

As a result, it is beginning to feel a bit like the 1970’s, another decade in which people lost faith in their institutions and lost a sense of confidence about the future.3

The American Scene has dubbed Katrina, “The Anti-9/11“:

On September 11, there was little looting, no violence, tremendous unity. As I woke up this morning, in New Orleans they were suspending the evacuation because people were shooting at the helicopters.

On September 11, there was Rudy Giuliani, covered with ash and projecting authority. With Katrina, we’ve had Kathleen Blanco and Ray Nagin, projecting grief and confusion and uncertainty - and our President, playing the guitar.

On September 11, everyone was equal in death - stockbrokers and secretaries, lawyers and waiters, firemen and soldiers. With Katrina, the lines of race and class seem much, much brighter.

On September 11, someone had done it to us, and we could hit back. With Katrina, there’s no revenge or justice, only misery.

In a sense - and I don’t mean to be flip about this at all - 9/11 was a tragedy well-suited to the neoconservative vision, and Katrina is better suited to a paleoconservative view of the world. The fall of the twin towers was a nightmare, but the lessons of that dreadful day felt bracing - that America was still a great and united country; that we had been too long asleep while threats gathered; that the time had come to put aside irony and drift and experience a new birth of resolve and martial vigor. 9/11 allowed people, and especially writers (myself included), to strike quasi-Churchillian poses, tell “hard truths” and talk tough about what needed to be done to defeat our enemies. It made us feel awful, but it also made us good about ourselves.

Whereas the only lessons of Katrina are that life is dark and death is everywhere, that nature isn’t our friend and that Americans, too, can behave like savages under duress, and that all the blessings of liberalism and democracy and capitalism can’t protect us from the worst. There’s nothing we can do, except give money and pray, and there’s no lesson to be learned - except, perhaps, be careful where and how you build your cities.

But the comparison between Katrina and 9/11 is flawed, as Shepherd Bliss points out:

In contrast to New Orleans, after the terrorist attacks on New York of Sept. 11, 2001, and this year in London, people pulled together. Good local leadership helped. Those attacks, of course, were not as devastating as Hurricane Katrina on a whole city, but their surprise and shock values were high. A hurricane attacking New Orleans was no surprise. New Orleans leading newspaper, the Times-Picayune, National Public Radio, and the New York Times all had major articles three years ago about the vulnerability of New Orleans to being flooded.

A commenter at the Oil Drum makes the point even more sharply:

I’ve heard many comparisons now between 9/11 - New York, and Katrina - New Orleans, and quite frankly am shocked that anyone would dare compare the two.

9/11, as horrific as it was, displaced far fewer from their homes. It did not destroy New York City. Emergency responders did not have all their homes destroyed or made inaccessible.

The vast majority of the people in the region got to go home and sleep that night, and every night to follow. The local A+P store was still open; you could still pop in to 7-11 for some cream for the morning coffee; still get TV and radio reception and tune into HBO if somehow you could put the event aside for a few hours.

The two events are not comparable.

If NYC had been struck a blow as bad as New Orleans, you can be sure there’d be riots in the streets, looting, and worse.

Yet, soldiers entering New Orleans were more surprised by what they didn’t find:

But when they arrived, they did not find marauding mobs. They did not come under fire. They found people who had lost everything in the storm and, since then, their dignity.

The troops were part of the Superdome team that came to town before the hurricane. For days, they had been cut off from news reports, sleeping and working among the refugees and the vicious rumor mill at the Superdome.

Their Superdome duties left them with a terrible image of the city. They knew that out on the streets, a police officer had been shot in the head, that looting was widespread, that snipers were taking shots even at boaters trying to rescue victims from rooftops and attics.

Now assigned to patrol the streets, they headed for the New Orleans Convention Center, in the city’s central business district. Many had wads of tobacco in their bottom lip and emitted long, dense streams of spittle into the streets below.

Their mission was to establish a command post at the center, which officials have increasingly turned their attention to, particularly as the evacuation of the Superdome nears its end. They would then build a staging area to bring in food and water. Finally, they would send in teams to seize control of a massive and lawless facility.

The troops braced for the worst.4

Days after the flood, a New York reporter wrote:

I saw persons take watches from dead men’s jackets and brutally tore finger-rings from the hands of women. The ruffians also climbed into the overturned houses and ransacked the rooms, taking whatever they thought valuable.

But, as a clever poster at MetaFilter pointed out, “the flood” in this case wasn’t in New Orleans–it was much closer to us here at Anthropik, in Johnstown.

Are we exaggerating the violence of New Orleans to match our self-loathing, Hobbesian vision of ourselves? Am I doing precisely the opposite, trying to downplay the obvious evidence in order to maintain a rosy-colored picture of humanity? It is impossible for me to say; I am not there. I can only rely on what others tell me.

I do know this–when a man tortures a pit bull to make him a fierce fighter, and then that pit bull mauls a child, we do not blame it on the inherently violent nature of dogs. We blame it on the man who tortured the pit bull to make him violent. New Orleans was a poor city even before Katrina. Those who remained were the poorest of the poor. We have become a people dependent on hierarchy. It has abused us so that we cannot live without it. We can no longer remember what “freedom” even means; all we can dream is to one day be the oppressor, rather than the oppressed. It is the sick fantasy of a slave beaten too hard, locked away too long, so that he no longer remembers what gentleness is, can no longer recollect the light.

The failure of our government to deal with this crisis is painfully evident for all to see. Recriminations have reverberated across the political spectrum, but already the have begun to settle into partisan camps. Liberals picked the easiest and most common sense target in George Bush; others have placed the blame at the feet of Mayor Nagin. This will likely continue to play out for some time with all the reason and decorum we’ve come to expect from modern American political discourse, but it seems we will once again only learn half the lesson.

This is what the State founds itself on. Precisely this kind of scenario. “Obey us, serve us, and we will protect you in times of catastrophe”; that is the social contract, that is the Faustian deal we strike with Leviathan. It is for that, that we sell ourselves to oppressors and tyrants, and shackle our lives, our futures, our souls to the will of the State. All we have asked in return is its protection from catastrophe. Now catastrophe has come, and the protection of the State is nowhere to be found.

The failures of federal, state and local governments to deal with this issue are obvious to everyone now. Yet we persist in the delusion that someone else might have done it better. In 10,000 years of civilization, Leviathan has an unbroken record of broken promises. The State cannot protect us from anything. It could not protect us from 9/11, it could not protect us from Katrina, it cannot protect us from the worse ravages to come–global warming, peak oil, and the end of civilization.

That is what we see in New Orleans, the lies of Leviathan laid bare for all to see. Yet we see something else, as well:

In the absence of information and outside assistance, groups of rich and poor banded together in the French Quarter, forming “tribes” and dividing up the labor. As some went down to the river to do the wash, others remained behind to protect property. In a bar, a bartender put near-perfect stitches into the torn ear of a robbery victim.

While mold and contagion grew in the muck that engulfed most of the city, something else sprouted in this most decadent of American neighborhoods — humanity.

“Some people became animals,” Vasilioas Tryphonas said Sunday morning as he sipped a hot beer in Johnny White’s Sports Bar on Bourbon Street. “We became more civilized.”

Police came through commandeering drivable vehicles and siphoning gas. Officials took over a hotel and ejected the guests.

An officer pumped his shotgun at a group trying to return to their hotel on Chartres Street.

“This is our block,” he said, pointing the gun down a side street. “Go that way.”

Jack Jones, a retired oil rig worker, bought a huge generator and stocked up on gasoline. But after hearing automatic gunfire on the next block one night, he became too afraid to use it — for fear of drawing attention.

Still, he continues to boil his clothes in vinegar and dip water out of neighbors’ pools for toilet flushing and bathing.

“They may have to shoot me to get me out of here,” he said. “I’m much better off here than anyplace they might take me.”

Many in outlying areas consider the Quarter a playground for the rich and complain that the place gets special attention.

Yes, wealthy people feasted on steak and quaffed warm champagne in the days after the storm. But many who stayed behind were the working poor — residents of the cramped spaces above the restaurants and shops.

Tired of waiting for trucks to come with food and water, residents turned to each other.

Johnny White’s is famous for never closing, even during a hurricane. The doors don’t even have locks.

Since the storm, it has become more than a bar. Along with the warm beer and shots, the bartenders passed out scrounged military Meals Ready to Eat and bottled water to the people who drive the mule carts, bus the tables and hawk the T-shirts that keep the Quarter’s economy humming.

“It’s our community center,” said Marcie Ramsey, 33, whom Katrina promoted from graveyard shift bartender to acting manager.

For some, the bar has also become a hospital.

Tryphonas, who restores buildings in the Quarter, left the neighborhood briefly Saturday. Someone hit in the head with a 2-by-4 and stole his last $5.

When Tryphonas showed up at Johnny White’s with his left ear split in two, Joseph Bellomy — a customer pressed into service as a bartender — put a wooden spoon between Tryphonas’ teeth and used a needle and thread to sew it up. Military medics who later looked at Bellomy’s handiwork decided to simply bandage the ear.

“That’s my savior,” Tryphonas said, raising his beer in salute to the former Air Force medical assistant.5

It is in times of crisis that our true nature is revealed. It is easy to go along in times of prosperity and plenty; it is in times of crisis that necessity strips us of our masks and lays bare our truth for all to see. And what truth has Katrina laid bare for us? That the victims of hierarchy cannot persist without her? Possibly. But more than that, it has revealed that hierarchy predates upon us, predicated upon a lie. It shows us that Leviathan cannot protect us, that when catastrophe befalls us, Leviathan will fail. It shows us that hierarchy, domination, coercion, all fail.

But it also shows us that in catastrophe, people turn to one another, and to the only thing that really works–tribes. It shows us that tribes endure. While your hierarchy fails, our tribes endure. It shows us that hope endures. And humanity–humanity endures.

Sources

1 Paul Simao, “Survivors describe week of horror in New Orleans,” Reuters, 3 September 2005, 8:57 PM ET [ Back ]

2 Quicktime clip [ Back ]

3 David Brooks, “The Bursting Point,” The New York Times, 4 September 2005. [ Back ]

4 Scott Gold, “Met by Depair, not Violence,” Los Angeles Times, 3 September 2005 [ Back ]

5 Allen G. Breed, “French Quarter Holdouts Create ‘Tribes’,” Associated Press, 4 September 2005, 7:59 PM ET [ Back ]

Categories: Articles

Tags: No Tags

Tags

  • No Tags

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. […] We gravitate towards band-level society whenever we have the option. Our social circles will tend to have a band-like quality to them, as Steve Thomas highlighted. When resources grow thin and the luxury of hierarchy can no longer be afforded, we consistently see people turn to band-level groups. In the wake of Katrina, “tribes” formed in New Orleans’ French Quarter. Daniel Quinn pointed to cults and gangs as responding to this same impulse towards the small, tightly-knit community–even if they often neglected the essential element of egalitarianism that defines rhizome. […]

    Pingback by Thesis #7: Humans are best adapted to band life. » The Anthropik Network — 22 September 2005 @ 11:45 AM

  2. […] More recently, we have seen another dramatic example of such a collapse: in New Orleans, in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Once again, surrounding complex societies–the United States, in this case–quickly moved to reabsorb the collapsed area into the system of complexity. Once again, increased complexity is our response to every challenge: rather than simplify and simply abandon the unsustainable site of New Orleans, the city will be rebuilt, driving the diminishing returns of the complexity strategy lower. […]

    Pingback by We All Fall Down » The Anthropik Network — 28 September 2005 @ 11:51 AM

  3. […] The Anthropik Network The State of Nature in Katrina Eye Posted by root 2 hours 40 minutes ago (http://anthropik.com) The local a p store was still open you could still pop in to 7 11 for some cream for the morning coffee still get tv and radio comment by jason godesky 5 september 2005 3 57 pm comment by jason godesky 10 september 2005 4 02 pm creative commons middot pow Discuss  |  Bury |  News | The Anthropik Network The State of Nature in Katrina Eye […]

    Pingback by The Anthropik Network The State of Nature in Katrina Eye | Best Eye Cream — 7 June 2009 @ 9:52 PM


Comments

  1. As a result, it is beginning to feel a bit like the 1970’s, another decade in which people lost faith in their institutions and lost a sense of confidence about the future.

    I included that last paragraph because, interestingly, the turmoil of the 1970s was largely traceable to the North American Hubbert Peak….

    Comment by Jason Godesky — 5 September 2005 @ 3:57 PM

  2. It occurs to me that the situation in New Orleans actually supports the idea of “the thin veneer of ‘barbarism’ over human compassion” or some such.

    How many conservatives (and perhaps liberals as well) have asserted over the years that a strong authority figure is the only thing preventing people from generally running around and engaging in murder, mayhem and destruction?

    Yet in NO, we find that apart from a tiny minority, in a situation of mass starvation and desperation, the great majority is maintaining civil discourse, person to person supportive behaviors and, in some cases, full on organic tribal development.

    Sounds like solid evidence suggesting that, in reality, man is NOT flawed…

    Janene

    Comment by Janene — 6 September 2005 @ 11:42 AM

  3. Here’s another article about a group of people working together in a desperate time.

    I do understand it’s just another set of Leviathan’s broken promises. I also understand it’s an example of things to come. It still makes me furious, though.

    Comment by Bill Maxwell — 8 September 2005 @ 10:06 PM

  4. From an excellent article on this very subject: http://www.harpers.org/TheUsesOfDisaster.html

    We should not be surprised, then, that what transpires in the immediate aftermath of a disaster is nothing like the popular version. People rarely panic or stampede, nor do they often immediately engage in looting or other acts of opportunism. The Scottish-born mathematician Eric Temple Bell, who witnessed the 1906 San Francisco earthquake and fire, saw “no running around the streets, or shrieking, or anything of that sort� but instead people who “walked calmly from place to place, and watched the fire with almost indifference, and then with jokes, that were not forced either, but wholly spontaneous.� Another survivor, San Francisco editor Charles B. Sedgwick, noted-perhaps somewhat hyperbolically-that “even the selfish, the sordid and the greedy became transformed that day-and, indeed, throughout that trying period-and true humanity reigned.� This phenomenon of “surprising� human kindness and good sense is replicated time and again.

    Many official disaster-preparedness scenarios nonetheless presume that human beings are prone to panic and in need of policing. A sort of Hobbesian true human nature emerges, according to this version, and people trample one another to flee, or loot and pillage, or they haplessly await rescue. In the movie version, this is the necessary precondition for John Wayne, Harrison Ford, or one of their shovel-jawed brethren to save the day and focus the narrative. In the government version, this is why we need the government. In 1906, for example, no one quite declared martial law, but soldiers, policemen, and some armed college students patrolled the streets of San Francisco looking for looters, with orders to shoot on sight. Even taking food from buildings about to burn down was treated as a crime: property and order were prized above survival or even reason. But “the authorities� are too few and too centralized to respond to the dispersed and numerous emergencies of a disaster. Instead, the people classified as victims generally do what can be done to save themselves and one another. In doing so, they discover not only the potential power of civil society but also the fragility of existing structures of authority.

    It’s worth the read.

    Comment by Devin — 9 September 2005 @ 6:13 PM

  5. More relevant:

    Disasters are almost by definition about the failure of authority, in part because the powers that be are supposed to protect us from them, in part also because the thousand dispersed needs of a disaster overwhelm even the best governments, and because the government version of governing often arrives at the point of a gun. But the authorities don’t usually fail so spectacularly. Failure at this level requires sustained effort. The deepening of the divide between the haves and have nots, the stripping away of social services, the defunding of the infrastructure, mean that this disaster—not of weather but of policy—has been more or less what was intended to happen, if not so starkly in plain sight.

    Many of the stories we hear about sudden natural disasters are about the brutally selfish human nature of the survivors, predicated on the notion that survival is, like the marketplace, a matter of competition, not cooperation. Cooperation flourishes anyway. (Slonsky and Bradshaw were part of a large group that had set up a civilized, independent camp.) And when we look back at Katrina, we may see that the greatest savagery was that of our public officials, who not only failed to provide the infrastructure, social services, and opportunities that would have significantly decreased the vulnerability of pre-hurricane New Orleans but who also, when disaster did occur, put their ideology before their people.

    Comment by Devin — 9 September 2005 @ 6:21 PM

  6. One thing illustrated by the Katrina disaster may be the atrophy imposed on human ingenuity by society’s total addiction to fossil fuels. With the energy grid destroyed by natural disaster, the ‘means of production’ suddenly returns to its original primitive default setting - and people immediately begin to die of exposure, thirst, starvation, and social chaos. This, of course, is what prompts the massive relief efforts we are now witnessing by those elements of society which are still connected to the energy grid (i.e. the fossil fuel ‘crack pipe’). This is why it is so important to get the disaster area back on the energy grid as soon as possible. But the really scary part is that there is no alternative renewable energy source capable of supporting the global population once fossil fuels become economically cost-inefficient to produce.

    Once upon a time, humans knew how to survive (and even thrive), utilizing strictly renewable energy sources, but agribusiness and fossil fuel dependency have effectively deprived most of the global population of its hunter/gatherer survival skills, and in doing so, have overproduced by billions the number of hungry mouths the earth is being asked to feed.

    One of the markers of the onset of the condition known as ‘peak oil’ is skyrocketing prices at the gas pumps. We are certainly not there (i.e. at ‘peak oil’) - yet. But the spike in fuel prices caused by Katrina suggests that the anti-fossil fuel theorists and advocates are, well, not far off the mark. What do you think about this?
    ~Crazybaldman

    Simple Wisdom
    “We are a society that is killing its grandchildren to feed its children.” Tom Brown Jr.

    Below is an excerpt from a webpage describing the energy dilemma. For the full page click here:
    http://dieoff.com/synopsis.htm

    “H.T. Odum’s solar “eMergy” (eMbodied energy) measures all of the energy (adjusted for quality) that went into the production of a product. Odum’s calculations show that the only forms of alternative energy that can survive the exhaustion of fossil fuel are muscle, burning biomass (wood, animal dung, or peat), hydroelectric, geothermal in volcanic areas, and some wind electrical generation. Nuclear power could be viable if one could overcome the shortage of fuel. No other alternatives (e.g., solar voltaic) produce a large enough net sej to be sustainable. In short, there is no way out.

    The fact that our society can not survive on alternative energy should come as no surprise, because only an idiot would believe that windmills and solar panels can run bulldozers, elevators, steel mills, glass factories, electric heat, air conditioning, aircraft, automobiles, etc., AND still have enough energy left over to support a corrupt political system, armies, etc.

    [ If you are interested in more specific details, read the messages at http://www.egroups.com/messages/energyresources or write to me at mailto:j@qmail.com ]” http://dieoff.com/synopsis.htm

    Comment by Crazybaldman — 10 September 2005 @ 1:18 PM

  7. My previous post, “On Katrina,” which was linked in the first paragraph of this one, highlighted the effects of Katrina on our fossil fuel subsidies, and suggested that Katrina may become a major catalyst in Peak Oil.

    Comment by Jason Godesky — 10 September 2005 @ 4:02 PM

Close
E-mail It