Comments on: The Unfolding Collapse http://anthropik.com se wo were fi na wosan kofa a yenki Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:26:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: SurvivalTopics.com http://anthropik.com/series/unfolding/#comment-181255 SurvivalTopics.com Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:05:58 +0000 http://anthropik.com/series/unfolding/#comment-181255 The normal cycle of things. I suggest we all be prepared. The normal cycle of things. I suggest we all be prepared.

]]>
By: Living in Collapse (The Anthropik Network) http://anthropik.com/series/unfolding/#comment-137456 Living in Collapse (The Anthropik Network) Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:14:54 +0000 http://anthropik.com/series/unfolding/#comment-137456 [...] What we've examined in this series presents a very different view of the 20th century's place in history. The European empires, particularly in the "long nineteenth century," reached an historically-uparalleled apex in global social complexity, consolidating the earth and its human population under a minimum of imperial governments, while also passing the point of diminishing returns for further investments in complexity. The energy source for this era of imperialism, coal, directed European empires towards territorial acquisitions. However, the shift from coal to petroleum brought with it a violent re-alignment of political power, shifting from the traditional European coal centers in Britain, France and Germany, to the significant oil producers, the United States and the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union suffered from an overly complex government, but it collapsed ultimately as a result of peaking oil production. Meanwhile, the shift from coal to petroleum led to global independence movements and the end of European imperialism. Instead, neocolonialism contiues to exploit former colonies in a system of globalization that maintains an imperial core consisting to some degree of the former European imperial centers, but increasingly the new imperial center in the United States. This more subtle form of empire is itself a clear sign of collapse, however, with proliferating de jure independence movements that eliminate the established level of European imperial complexity, as well as the rise of various "rhizome" networks, from multinational corporations to terrorist networks, that defy the conventional, Cartesian definition of the nation-state, and represent the next step down towards collapse. [...] […] What we’ve examined in this series presents a very different view of the 20th century’s place in history. The European empires, particularly in the “long nineteenth century,” reached an historically-uparalleled apex in global social complexity, consolidating the earth and its human population under a minimum of imperial governments, while also passing the point of diminishing returns for further investments in complexity. The energy source for this era of imperialism, coal, directed European empires towards territorial acquisitions. However, the shift from coal to petroleum brought with it a violent re-alignment of political power, shifting from the traditional European coal centers in Britain, France and Germany, to the significant oil producers, the United States and the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union suffered from an overly complex government, but it collapsed ultimately as a result of peaking oil production. Meanwhile, the shift from coal to petroleum led to global independence movements and the end of European imperialism. Instead, neocolonialism contiues to exploit former colonies in a system of globalization that maintains an imperial core consisting to some degree of the former European imperial centers, but increasingly the new imperial center in the United States. This more subtle form of empire is itself a clear sign of collapse, however, with proliferating de jure independence movements that eliminate the established level of European imperial complexity, as well as the rise of various “rhizome” networks, from multinational corporations to terrorist networks, that defy the conventional, Cartesian definition of the nation-state, and represent the next step down towards collapse. […]

]]>
By: yooper http://anthropik.com/series/unfolding/#comment-137255 yooper Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:27:45 +0000 http://anthropik.com/series/unfolding/#comment-137255 People that live in Bagdad or near the Katerina diaster are not concerned of "why", they're much more concerned, "what's next?" People that live in Bagdad or near the Katerina diaster are not concerned of “why”, they’re much more concerned, “what’s next?”

]]>
By: yooper http://anthropik.com/series/unfolding/#comment-137248 yooper Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:11:56 +0000 http://anthropik.com/series/unfolding/#comment-137248 The "long emergenrcy" is about as likely as having another "great depression". We cannot afford either. The “long emergenrcy” is about as likely as having another “great depression”. We cannot afford either.

]]>
By: Archdruid Watch: A Depopulation Explosion? (The Anthropik Network) http://anthropik.com/series/unfolding/#comment-136594 Archdruid Watch: A Depopulation Explosion? (The Anthropik Network) Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:33:21 +0000 http://anthropik.com/series/unfolding/#comment-136594 [...] This week's Archdruid Report, "A Depopulation Explosion," focuses on the same general theme Greer's been on for the past three weeks: how wrong "apocalyptic narratives" are (by which he generally means primitivists, and not people who actually believe in a coming apocalypse, like Evangelical Christians). If anybody was expecting the collapse of civilization to wipe out every city on earth overnight, then Greer's article provides a great counter-balance, but since that's a straw man that no one's actually espousing, his point is somewhat less compelling. As we've seen in the recently-concluded "Unfolding Collapse" series, we're not at the beginning of collapse, but well into it now. Greer's viewpoint of the "long decline" isn't wrong, nearly so much as it's academic. Historians have the hindsight to trace the trajectory of a long decline; those who live through those events invariably experience them as a sudden crash. [...] […] This week’s Archdruid Report, “A Depopulation Explosion,” focuses on the same general theme Greer’s been on for the past three weeks: how wrong “apocalyptic narratives” are (by which he generally means primitivists, and not people who actually believe in a coming apocalypse, like Evangelical Christians). If anybody was expecting the collapse of civilization to wipe out every city on earth overnight, then Greer’s article provides a great counter-balance, but since that’s a straw man that no one’s actually espousing, his point is somewhat less compelling. As we’ve seen in the recently-concluded “Unfolding Collapse” series, we’re not at the beginning of collapse, but well into it now. Greer’s viewpoint of the “long decline” isn’t wrong, nearly so much as it’s academic. Historians have the hindsight to trace the trajectory of a long decline; those who live through those events invariably experience them as a sudden crash. […]

]]>
By: Eat, drink and try to survive. « WildeRix http://anthropik.com/series/unfolding/#comment-84905 Eat, drink and try to survive. « WildeRix Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:41:07 +0000 http://anthropik.com/series/unfolding/#comment-84905 [...] Also, the authors at Anthropik are back in the game.  Be sure to check out their latest blog series: The Unfolding Collapse. [...] […] Also, the authors at Anthropik are back in the game.  Be sure to check out their latest blog series: The Unfolding Collapse. […]

]]>